"Sometimes attaining the deepest familiarity with a question is our best substitute for actually having the answer." - Brian Greene, The Elegant Universe

In that sentence, I think that Brian Greene has summarized the attitude of many physicists, especially those whose training and experience has driven them into an over-familiarity with all the unanswered questions in modern particle physics. Quantum Mechanics has proposed too many inexplicable phenomena, with which too many physicists have become too complacently over-familiar. Quantum mechanics and classical physics just cannot be fully reconciled, too many say. Which would be fine if quantum mechanics then went on to explain everything that classical physics could not, but it doesn't. It attains the deepest familiarity with the questions and presents that as an alternative to having any answers.

But there are answers to all of the questions. If you would prefer a more simple explanation of all of the unanswered questions thrown up by Quantum Mechanics and other modern Quantum Physics concepts, along with their solutions, please do consider getting a copy of my book, which is detailed at the bottom of this page, after some very brief information about me. It is not necessary, however, to make any purchase in order to understand my Theory of Absolute Relativity; the following pages each take an important aspect of Quantum Physics, often referring to information published on the Net, scientific papers or other publications, and then applies my theory. Wherever I look in Quantum Physics, the Theory of Absolute Unified Relativity simplifies and explains, solving the problems that have confounded physicists since Einstein and Bohr.

So please do study the following pages, even if you do not choose to purchase a copy of my book; and do feel free to leave comments, as long as they are inoffensive and constructive.

The Von Neuman Process

From: The Information Philosopher

John von Neumann

In his 1932 Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics (in German, English edition 1955) John von Neumann explained that two fundamentally different processes are going on in quantum mechanics (in a temporal sequence for a given particle - not at the same time). 

Process 1. A non-causal process, in which the measured electron winds up randomly in one of the possible physical states (eigenstates) of the measuring apparatus plus electron.

The probability for each eigenstate is given by the square of the coefficients cn of the expansion of the original system state (wave function ψ) in an infinite set of wave functions φ that represent the eigenfunctions of the measuring apparatus plus electron.

                                                 cn = < φn | ψ >

This is as close as we get to a description of the motion of the particle aspect of a quantum system. According to von Neumann, the particle simply shows up somewhere as a result of a measurement.

Process 2. A causal process, in which the electron wave function ψ evolves deterministically according to Erwin Schrödinger's equation of motion for the wavelike aspect. This evolution describes the motion of the probability amplitude wave ψ between measurements. The wave function exhibits interference effects. But interference is destroyed if the particle has a definite position or momentum. The particle path itself cannot be observed.

                                                (ih/2π) ∂ψ/∂t = Hψ

Von Neumann claimed there is another major difference between these two processes. Process 1 is thermodynamically irreversible. Process 2 is reversible. This confirms the fundamental connection between quantum mechanics and thermodynamics that is explainable by information physics and the information interpretation of quantum mechanics.

Process 2 is deterministic and information preserving or conserving.

The first of these processes has come to be called the collapse of the wave function.

It gave rise to the so-called problem of measurement, because its randomness prevents it from being a part of the deterministic mathematics of process 2.

Examined from the point of view of Unified Absolute Relativity, it makes better sense to reverse the two:

Process 2 describes the change in energy of the originating atom: specifically, the energy available to interact with another atom. When another atom reacts to the available energy described by the Hamiltonian, energy is transferred between the two; the energy transferred depends upon the state of the receiving atom in relation to the energy made available by the originating atom.

The position of the receiving atom cannot be determined, but can be estimated by a process of probability, according to the Born Rule.

Process 2, by this interpretation, must be thermodynamically reversible, as no energy has been transferred.

As soon as Process 1 occurs, the energy is transferred from the originating to the receiving atom and the wavefunction is seen to collapse – no longer thermodynamically reversible.

The receiving atom, if now rendered out of equilibrium with its environment, that is with surrounding atoms, becomes an emitting or originating atom, emitting a wavefunction equivalent to the extra energy it had received. So a wavefunction from an originating atom (Process 2) transfers energy to a receiving atom (Process 1) which sets up a wavefunction in the received atom (Process 2) which has become an originating atom.

Absolute relativity does not separate the two functions in terms of sub-atomic particles and their positions; Process 2 describes the effect on an atom after the effect of Process 1, which has responded to an atom that has previously experienced the same processes. So the effect is transferred from one atom to the next, in a chain of events called the Von Neuman Chain; an effect which some consider is terminated only by consciousness (see the section on Quantum Mechanics and Human Consciousness).

So Unified Absolute Relativity solves the measurement problem by amalgamating the two factors of the Neuman Process.

No comments:

Post a Comment